Skip to main content

Java puzzler

You'll need an understanding of weak references to have a meaningful stab at this one.

public class Test {

public static void main(String[] args) {
List<byte[]> list = new ArrayList<byte[]>();

Object thing = new Object();
WeakReference<Object> ref = new WeakReference<Object>(thing);

while(ref.get()!=null) {
list.add(new byte[10000]);


Before reading any further give it a stab, see what you come up with. Then run it and see. Oh and yes, it compiles and runs.


Well, there's two possible options that you could have sensibly come up with. The first is what most people assume will always happen - the byte array will fill up to cause an OutOfMemoryError and the weak reference will never be garbage collected because there also exists a strong reference (thing) that remains in scope throughout the application and thus doesn't "let go" of the object. And indeed if you run it with early versions of Java, this is exactly what will happen.

However, with the latest version of JDK7 (update 2 at the time of writing) the program doesn't do the above, it prints out "bam" and exits cleanly. This initially seems weird - there's still a strong reference in scope so why on earth is it garbage collected?

It boils down to improvements in the JIT. It realises that the hard reference isn't actually used again, so sets it to null thus making it eligible for garbage collection. Put something like "thing.getClass();" as the last line of the program and it always forces the OutOfMemoryError because if that's the case the JIT can't make this optimisation. It's a behaviour that's actually explicitly covered in the JLS:

Optimizing transformations of a program can be designed that reduce the number of objects that are reachable to be less than those which would naively be considered reachable. For example, a compiler or code generator may choose to set a variable or parameter that will no longer be used to null to cause the storage for such an object to be potentially reclaimable sooner.

The lesson? Objects can be garbage collected when the JIT decides they're no longer in use, and this may be earlier when it seems - and this in turn means that finalizers can be called when the object might trivially seem in-scope and thus ineligible for collection.


Popular posts from this blog

The comprehensive (and free) DVD / Blu-ray ripping Guide!

Note: If you've read this guide already (or when you've read it) then going through all of it each time you want to rip something can be a bit of a pain, especially when you just need your memory jogging on one particular section. Because of that, I've put together a quick "cheat sheet" here which acts as a handy reference just to jog your memory on each key step.

I've seen a few guides around on ripping DVDs, but fewer for Blu-rays, and many miss what I believe are important steps (such as ensuring the correct foreign language subtitles are preserved!) While ripping your entire DVD collection would have seemed insane due to storage requirements even a few years ago, these days it can make perfect sense.

This guide doesn't show you a one click approach that does all the work for you, it's much more of a manual process. But the benefits of putting a bit more effort in really do pay off - you get to use entirely free tools with no demo versions, it's …

Expanding JavaFX's media support

Note: For those that don't want to read through the post and just want the patch for MKV support, you can grab it from this ticket, or here if you don't have a JIRA account.
Background One of the predominant things lacking a "nice" approach in the Java world for years now has been good media support. Oh sure, we had JMF, but anyone who ever had the misfortune of using that will I'm sure understand why that never really took on. (Yes, it really was that bad.) A few other approaches came and went, most notably Java Media Components - but none ever made there way into core Java, and for a long time it became pretty de-facto knowledge that if you wanted any form of comprehensive media support in Java, you used a cross-platform native library, perhaps with a Java wrapper.

However, when JavaFX 2 came along we were provided with a new, baked in media framework that provided this functionality on the Java level! This is a massive step forward, sure it uses GStreamer unde…

Draggable and detachable tabs in JavaFX 2

JavaFX currently doesn't have the built in ability to change the order of tabs by dragging them, neither does it have the ability to detach tabs into separate windows (like a lot of browsers do these days.) There is a general issue for improving TabPanes filed here, so if you'd like to see this sort of behaviour added in the main JavaFX libraries then go ahead and cast your vote, it would be a very welcome addition!

However, as nice as this would be in the future, it's not here at the moment and it looks highly unlikely it'll be here for Java 8 either. I've seen a few brief attempts at reordering tabs in JavaFX, but very few examples on dragging them and nothing to do with detaching / reattaching them from the pane.

Given this, I've decided to create a reusable class that should hopefully be as easy as possible to integrate into existing applciations - it extends from Tab, and for the most part you create it and use it like a normal tab (you can just add it to…